Setting Priorities in Diarrhoeal Disease Research: Merits and Pitfalls of Expert Opinion
نویسنده
چکیده
Correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed to: Dr. Wolf-Peter Schmidt Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT UK Email: [email protected] Fax: ++44-(0)20-7636-7843 In this issue of the Journal, Kosek and colleagues report the results of an exercise conducted by leading experts in diarrhoea, ranking different topics in diarrhoea research according to their potential to contribute to a substantial reduction in diarrhoeal disease by 2015 in accordance with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (1). It is always easy to criticize the outcome of such expert panels. Inevitably, some researchers may feel that the merits of their particular research field were not sufficiently appreciated. It can be argued, however, that such exercises are useful if the results are interpreted appropriately.
منابع مشابه
Reflections on Norheim (2018), Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published; Comment on “Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy”
The publication of Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition (DCP3) is a major milestone in the global health world. DCP3 reviews and summarizes high quality health intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence relevant to low- and middle-income countries and is freely available to users...
متن کاملDisease Control Priorities Third Edition: Time to Put a Theory of Change Into Practice; Comment on “Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy”
The Disease Control Priorities program (DCP) has pioneered the use of economic evidence in health. The theory of change (ToC) put forward by Norheim is a further welcome and necessary step towards translating DCP evidence into better priority setting in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We also agree that institutionalising evidence for informed priority-setting processes is crucial. Un...
متن کاملDisease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy
How can evidence from economic evaluations of the type the Disease Control Priorities project have synthesized be translated to better priority setting? This evidence provides insights into how investing in health, particularly though priority interventions and expanded access to health insurance and prepaid care, can not only save lives but also help alleviate poverty and provide financial ris...
متن کاملA youth-led reproductive health program in a university setting
Background: Reproductive health problems affect youths in all countries. There is an urgent need to enhance youths reproductive health services to provide a healthy life for this group. In this regard, the present study aimed to evaluate the Reproductive Health Peer Education Program based on the opinion of university students. Methods :This interventional study was conducted in Qazvin Univ...
متن کاملThe Future of Disease Control Priorities; Comment on “Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy”
The Disease Control Priorities (DCP) project has substantially influenced national and global health priorities since 1993. DCP’s basic framework involves identification of disease burdens based on premature deaths and disability and application of the most cost-effective interventions to the largest burdens, taking into account local feasibility. The future impact of DCP will need to take into...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 27 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009